This blog is super boring
Hmmm... this blog is getting super boring. Actually so is the internet but that is not my responsibility, is it?
Zzzz what?? Did you say something? I nodded off for a second. It's a cliche to stop blogging but what do you do when your blog gets boring? Also incidentally I agree with Dwight Schrute... this is now a web log. What does it say that I knew how to spell Schrute without looking it up?
This post sucks. Hmmm. A real dilemma here people. Something has to be done about this. I don't know what.
Update The husband thinks I might want to consider adding a new character to boost ratings... a Poochie sort of a concept. One who could spew catchphrases and stand around drinking corporate beverages... and end up on bootlegged t-shirts... I could squeeze a few more gasping seasons out of tiny dog with a cute little Andrew Keaton type of rascal...
posted by Strikethru at
8:36 AM
9 Comments:
Have you seen ads for "the boyfriend trouser?" Surely, tiny-dog has something to say about that!
I happen to know that Tiny Dog was rocking the boy trousers look long before the rest of the world caught on.
Except that Dave Barry has already talked about the boyfriend trouser phenom. What is left for tiny dog to do except go out and get a pair? How would these differ from the Husband Trouser? I don't want to know.
Ok maybe I wore men's pants for about 10 years, and still wear inexplicably oversized women's pants.
When I look to my tight-assed sisters in their sprayed on low-risers, I wonder where I was when god handed out the Thou Shall Wear Tight Pants mandate to the ladies.
"How would these differ from the Husband Trouser?"
Exactly! It's not the trousers that are repellent, it's the advertising gimmick. Then again, why am I expecting the Gap to be a model for good taste?
I am thinking you dudes need a Girlfriend Trouser. Here are the features you would enjoy:
1) Vanity sizing. This would mean your logical waist and inseam measurements would be replaced by meaningless digits that do not correspond to any known standard and vary from brand to brand. Also, they grow larger over time.
2) "Ample" length. No matter how small a size of pants you buy, the legs are still far, far too long, unless you are unusually taller than average, I mean so tall, people would stare.
3) Low ridin'. or, high ridin'. Ladies pants, depending on fashion whims, tend to come in a uniform waist height, although manufacturers will try to fool you by offering "shades" of the same waist height, e.g., Low ridin' casuals, mid ridin' lowriders, how low can you go low rise, etc. Thus, based on the decade you are in, you will either reveal ass crack even when standing up straight, or you will be buttoning your pants up directly below your breasts. Men kind of have breasts so work with me here people.
4) Inflated prices. You will pay special ladies' pricing on pants made with the same material, in the same Chinese factory as men's pants. But they are ladies' pants, and women are stupid and like to pay 3x the amount of men for basic staples, because we want to be pretty, oh so pretty, and ad campaigns tell us that paying more is prettier.
Gap, it's time to offer this product.
This web log rocks. I simply do not understand anything ever posted here but that's okay. I continually return. why? no ads. In fact I would float through the vaccum of space zipped up in a sleeping bag if I could just to avoid ads. I hate ads. I'll buy girlfriend trowsers as long as they are never advertised ever. this post sucks.
let me qualify: when I said this post sucks I most definately refered to my post.. not tiny-dog's which ruled. seriously ... this is the best and only relevant place on the "web" worth going. this follow up to the previous post which sucked... sucks.
You just gave me an idea.
Tiny dog needs ads!
Post a Comment
<< Home